JCRC UPDATE: December 6, 2001

THE TERRORIST ATTACKS OF DECEMBER 1-2

The Toll
26 innocent people in Israel were brutally murdered in cold blood and at least 175 wounded by Palestinian terrorists, all within 14 hours, during the weekend of December 1-2, 2001.
This is the equivalent, on a proportional basis, of 1,200 American deaths and 8,000 wounded.

Those Responsible
· In September 2000, Arafat rejected negotiation and instead launched Intifada 2. He has the responsibility for the wave of violence and terrorism that has followed.
· Arafat and the Palestinian Authority (PA) provide cover and sanctuary for the largest coalition of terrorist groups from the Middle East to Afghanistan. Among them are Hamas and the Islamic Jihad, perpetrators of the latest outrages.
· There is clear evidence of Arafat's complicity in and responsibility for the Palestinian violence. Despite their clear obligation under the Oslo accords to police terrorists and to imprison those accused of planning as well as those who have performed terrorist acts, the PA's "counter-terrorism efforts" have been "for show only". The "arrest" of terrorists has been no more than a charade of revolving doors.
· As US Secretary of State Powell said following last week's terror attacks: "The moment of truth is upon us. Arafat must now choose to which camp he belongs - that of the terrorists or that of the peacemakers."

Israel's Response
· Prime Minister Sharon stated: "A war has been forced upon us. A war of terror. A war that claims innocent victims daily. ... The aim of this war of terror … is to expel us from here…to bring us to total despair, a loss of hope, and a loss of the national vision, which leads us as "A free people in our land, the land of Zion and Jerusalem. … This will not happen."
· On Dec 3, 2001, the government of Israel announced the Palestinian Authority as an entity that supports terrorism; and the Tanzim and Force 17 as terrorist organizations. The government is acting against them accordingly.
· Israel, like the United States, refuses to negotiate with terrorists.
· Israel is therefore, as is its clear responsibility, taking all steps necessary to prevent further attacks in Israel and to protect its citizens
· Israel is seeking an end to terrorism, not an end to the peace process. Prime Minister Sharon has stated his acceptance of the need to make 'painful compromises' for peace and a willingness to negotiate the establishment of a Palestinian state. However, terrorism can never be rewarded with concessions.

The United States Position
· President Bush: " And in my statement yesterday to the world I said it's now time for Mr. Arafat to prove whether or not he is for peace. And the way he can do that is to aggressively root out those who would derail the peace process by murdering innocent Israelis - innocent women, innocent children. And now is the time for him to step up and lead; he must show that behind his words of peace there is action. Because now is the time. We need action."
· Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld: "I think that a country that is that small does not have a big margin for error. It is impossible to defend against terrorists in every place, at every moment, against every technique. The only way you can do that is to take the battle to them. And therefore, you use the word "retaliation." I don't think of it as retaliation. I think of it as self-defense."

Home